The Hills of Fake Iowa, And The Deadly Effects Of Marriage

Francie Ford (Robin Goodrin Nordli) and George Page (Ted Deasy) learn about their wives (Gina Daniels, Terri McMahon) schemes to have their revenge on Senator John Falstaff. Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

At long last, and after much (internal, completely unnoticed by other humans) agonizing on my part, Part III:
Marriage

“I’ve never seen Christopher Liam Moore do anything – acting or directing – that I didn’t think was fantastic,” I said to my partner before we headed into the CLM-directed The Very Merry Wives of Windsor, Iowa. “Also, I’ve interviewed (Very Merry Wives writer) Alison Carey, and she’s brilliant, so I have hope for this play.”

Yeeeeeeaaaaaaaah.

I still think CLM usually kicks acting and directing butt (2010’s Cat on a Hot Tin Roof should have won national awards), and I still believe Alison Carey is brilliant. Her ability to combine the script of Shakespeare’s The Merry Wives of Windsor with contemporary English should win her some kind of adaptation/reinvention prize, at least in terms of language. But dear god, this play? This farce gone overboard? This parody without end? No.

Continue reading

Play On: Oregon Shakespeare Festival Summer Season, Part II

Archbishop of Canterbury (Richard Howard) assures Henry V (John Tufts) that there is no bar to his claim to France. Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

So I started off yesterday (well, Wednesday) with the Greeks as a theme, but Medea/Macbeth/Cinderella segues perfectly into the next two themes:

Music and Marriage

That bwessed awangement, that dweam wifin a dweam

Right, that, but I want to start with the food of love: music.

Oregon Shakespeare Festival artistic director Bill Rauch has never hidden his love for musicals; 2009’s Music Man was one of his first smash hits as artistic director, and he’s had a surprising number of live musicians onstage for many plays since. But I have noticed an uptick in music within the plays that aren’t musicals since Rauch came on board permanently in 2008.

Shakespeare, as I was told by my high school “Shakespeare on Stage” teacher (Ms. Berit Lindboe, if you ever read this, this entire thing is your fault, and by “thing,” I mean my life as a Shakespeare addictnerd), liked to put songs in his comedies. Thank god our high school class never had to make up tunes to go along with the lyrics. But I digress: The point is that under Rauch, the festival has gone hog-wild with the music. Continue reading

The Oregon Shakespeare Festival Plus The Greeks (Summer Reviews, Part I)

Touchstone (Peter Frechette) entertains Rosalind (Erica Sullivan) and Celia (Christine Albright). Photo by T. Charles Erickson.

The short and sweet of my five days in Ashland during outdoor opening of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival:

  • Go to As You Like It no matter what else you see. “It’s the play you take someone from out of town to,” said someone on Twitter, and I agree. Gorgeously presented, capably (often better than that) acted, with lighting and set designs that should win someone some awards.
  • If you have a good tolerance for war plays, hit both Henry V (in a rather traditional staging, though not traditional costuming) and Troilus and Cressida.
  • If you have a flexible mind and patience for a rather messy first act, and/or you love any of the plays involved, do go to Medea/Macbeth/Cinderella.
  • If you know nothing about the Midwest, have no dear-to-you relatives or friends there, and/or enjoy constant punning and The Merry Wives of Windsor, go ahead and hit up The Very Merry Wives of Windsor, Iowa. Otherwise, you might want to stay away.

Continue reading

Home Is The Place Where, When You Go There, They Have to Take You In: Sam Shepard’s Lie of the Mind At The Lord Leebrick

Jake (Kato Buss) and Lorraine (Rebecca Nachison). Photo courtesy of the Lord Leebrick Theatre Company

Forget the obvious age issues, the saggy middle of the play, the oddly cartoonish writing at the climax – the reasons to go see Sam Shepard’s A Lie of the Mind at the Lord Leebrick Theatre (through June 3) number at least two: Kato Buss and Mary Buss.

Not to give short shrift to Jeffrey Cook’s evocative and flexible set or to Rachel Kinsman Steck’s lighting design – which without being intrusive works to illuminate both the actors and their emotions – or the strong direction of Richard Leebrick (who, like Kato Buss, adores Sam Shepard), but without the family Buss, this would be quite a different, and I suspect lesser, experience.

Both Kato – who now has his Ph.D. from the University of Oregon – and Mary have raised the bar for Eugene acting during the past few years. I know at least Kato (congrats on that job, but damn you for leaving) won’t be here next season, so it’s especially great that they’re the vital center of Lie of the Mind. The play trades in images of wounded, lonely, lost people who go on damaging one another past the point where anyone with a lick of rationality would fearfully call a halt.

Indeed, action opens with an anguished, slightly surreal and definitely nightmarish phone call in which Jake (Kato) tells his far-away brother Frankie (Jacob King) that he’s killed his wife. He doesn’t know where he is; he doesn’t tell Frankie how to find him; he just hangs up the phone and wails.

Frankie (Jacob King) and Mike (Mike Hawkins). Photo courtesy of the Lord Leebrick Theatre Company

Also wailing (though internally more than externally), Beth (Mary) awakens in a hospital bed, seriously injured. Her brother Mike (Mike Hawkins, who hasn’t been on the Leebrick stage since the tour de force Pillowman production a few years ago) falters between a deep wish to help her and an overwhelming desire for revenge.

Both Jake and Beth come from hardscrabble families; Jake is the scion of an alcoholic fighter pilot, with a mother (Rebecca Nachison) who both favors and abuses him, and Beth’s father Baylor (Achilles Massahos) is straight out of Small Western Town Central Casting, with his heads of cattle and his hunting shack and his inability to see anyone else but himself.

He’s not the only self-focused one. Beth’s mother Meg (Gloria Nagalo) can’t focus on the world around her or remember events well; perhaps Shepard means us to know she’s nearly as brain-damaged as her directly injured daughter from her years with the mercurial, grumpy, unloving Baylor. Massahos pulls off a tightrope act as Baylor, who’s both a crazy asshole and a man deeply dependent on women, and Nagalo as the alternately generous and vacant Beth. Their orbits are fixed; Beth and Mike don’t really figure into their lives.

Shepard’s message, perhaps? The arid, deadly West damages men, and its men damage women. I’m reminded of Joe Wilkins’ painful and powerful essay Out West  – “We hurt the land, and it hurt us. Sometimes it hurt us physically … and sometimes it struck us in other, deeper ways.”

But Wilkins handles the harshness of Montana’s outer and inner landscapes with a sensitively honed touch; Shepard, on the other hand, uses class and rural life as a bludgeon. At the first intermission, one woman in line for the bathroom said to another, “I don’t know how Shepard can write about these characters. They’re all so unlikeable.” To put it mildly.

Perhaps there’s something about shadow characteristics, in a Jungian sense, for women watching this, or any, Shepard play. Jake’s mother Lorraine (Rebecca Nachison) alternates between a horrid coddling and a just as damaging neglect of her son. She doesn’t care if he’s killed Beth; she doesn’t even care about Beth at all except as a rival who took her son away from her. She sends her daughter Sally (Michelle Nordella) away when Sally seems to upset Jake – and there’s more than a hint that she’s also been complicit in letting Jake molest Sally. Nachison bites into the role of Lorraine with relish, treating the kids, including the sweet and hapless Frankie (King plays Frankie with a good mix of courage and naïvete, but both he and Nordella, with their unlined faces and youthful energy, seem to exist in an entirely different world from the rest of the cast), with a terrifying mix of disdain, regret, anger, possessiveness, suffocating care, and displeasure.

Who would want to be Lorraine or Sally or Meg? And who would want to be Beth, the magical truth-teller, the victim, the helpless one? Beth takes on a quasi-mystical role in the second act as she explains and resists the pull of her childhood home, but she also desperately desires her husband, her abuser. Where is he, this man whom her mother can barely acknowledge meeting? Where is he, this husband, whom she misses and wants to see even through the fog of the brain injury he caused her?

Why, he’s sorting through memories in his childhood room. He’s plotting to escape his mother. He’s dealing with memories and mementos of his WWII veteran, asshole, alcoholic, abusive, wreck of a father – a man whom he essentially murdered.

Beth (Mary Buss), with Meg (Gloria Nagalo) in the background. Photo courtesy of the Lord Leebrick Theatre Company

Shepard embraces Big Symbolic Touches like Beth, wearing her dad’s shirt, talking about how the clothes make the man – or make a human a maaaan. Like Jake wrapping himself in his father’s American flag and setting out for Beth’s family house, 500 miles away from his home, with no pants because his mother hid them. Like Lorraine’s burning of memories, her abandonment of the past and all of its complicated emotions. Why, you could write many a paper – and oh yes, it’s been done – on Shepard’s Symbols.

At certain times, I find them a tad bit obvious, a tad bit trite. The headless deer carcass in the living room. The flesh wound poisoning the innocent boy. Shepard’s bludgeon comes out hard at the climax. Those who revere the physical flag neglect the wounded; men like Mike who claim to protect women often just want to dictate to them out of competition with other men.

Yet sometimes wild heart attracts itself to wild heart, and things go wrong in mean, hard, petty, soul-crushing ways that can’t even be epic because epic is too much for these characters to reach for.

Joe Wilkins: “Go over it again: how it begins with the whims of wind and want, or maybe just some quick moment of stupidity; how failure and shame, even in an instant, become so impossibly heavy, a sack of stones you must shoulder; how this then is fear; and how fear someday detonates you — the slow implosion, the breakneck explosion.”

That’s Jake. That’s Beth. That’s Mike, and Baylor, and Lorraine. That’s the death of the family and the death of the past – except the past, of course, is never gone at all. It’s right there, embodied in everything these characters plan, say and do, embodied in the ways Jake lives in Beth and Beth inside of Jake.

Shepard gives the theatre crowd an entire shadow region of life – while we’re the ones who don’t beat each other up, the ones who know how to get a wounded man to the hospital, the ones who take responsibility and serve each other with honor and compassion, we know we could be like that. Shepard’s repellent characters may then serve a purpose for those of us who feel mauled by his plays: the knowledge that we’re capable of anything. And we can choose to do better by each other – and by ourselves.

The play runs through June 3 at the Lord Leebrick, 540 Charnelton St. Tix available at 541-465-1506, here, or at the door (though Leebrick plays have been selling out this year).

A Gaggle Of Playwrights, A Gallimaufry Of Plays: Northwest 10 Hits Its Fourth Year

What stands out most vividly from the Northwest 10 might be similar to what stands out from last year’s Winter’s Tale, also at the Lord Leebrick Theatre: Local actors Tom Wilson and Dan Pegoda make a good comedic team, and Pegoda plays the banjo well.

Wilson’s not even onstage for their particular pairing in “Lunker,” but his voice echoes in the head long after the 10-minute play, by Kato Buss, comes to an end – an end slightly different, and far more amusing, than the tale on which it’s modeled.

You see, the Northwest Ten doesn’t contain 10 plays – it’s a festival of several 10-minute plays, mostly by Eugene playwrights. This is its fourth year, and the plan for attendees remains the same: Don’t like a play? Wait 10 or 12 minutes, and boom! New play, new characters. Like the weather in Eugene in the spring, I know. Actors and directors tell me it’s fun, and rather a lot of work considering the 10-minute result. This year’s playwrights responded to a theme: Writing on the Wall. In the results, that’s rarely a physical demonstration, more often an ominous phrase hovering over the characters’ actions.

The plays, with their need to set the scene rapidly, establish character and contain a reveal, have an uneven quality that can be charming or annoying. I found myself wishing that they were developed more like sketches, but perhaps I’ve been watching too many random pieces of Portlandia.

Still, playwrights, wouldn’t it be pleasant to develop the idea with your cast? That might create more seamless intentions and better performances. I haven’t asked Kato Buss, but I wonder if he had his two adult characters in mind when he wrote “Lunker” – his play, directed by Mary Gen Fjelstad, exhibited the closest fit between characters as written and actor ability (I should add that in “Lunker,” 8-year-old Nalua Manaois was admirably cute and had all of her many lines down – nicely done).

The bleak “Fool on the Hill” may be one of this year’s keepers, though I wasn’t a big fan of its tone – Ty (Jay Hash) seemed at first to be heading in a different emotional direction than where he ended up, and both Daniel Borson as the annoyingly panicked Steve and Paul Rhoden as the crazed Paul might have been more convincing with less flailing about.

I also kept wondering if these characters had ever read anything about survival in the wild, which was definitely not the half-existential, half-violent point of the play. Or am I taking it too much into the psychological realm when it was the hand of a malevolent spirit (Bob Buechler, the Tree) that caused them to lose their logic? In any case, like a lot of horror, it sticks around.

I suppose loneliness and loss worm their way into our memories and hearts more easily than something like “You Slay Me,” a comedic contribution by Laura Robinson. In that piece, Ron Judd pulls off quite the amusing transformation with a light, surefooted touch that’s fun to see. (Some of the stage business seems too big for the story itself, but it’s still an enjoyable little piece.)

In “Picketing for Pros,” Jorah LaFleur (literally) kicks some serious energy into the proceedings, making her character, Caroline, both outrageous and sympathetic – and hilarious. I admit to an extra laugh at the mention of “an Iowa City clinic” (wave to the fantastic Emma Goldman– is Portland playwright Ari Chadwich-Saund from the Midwest? Hm…). I didn’t think the revelation of Caroline’s actual job fit with her character in general, but again, I might simply want people to be more consistently good than any playwright would go for.

Paul Calandrino is the original NW10 idea guy and one of three producers behind NW10 this year. His contribution is “Cape Perpetua,” in which poor Jay Hash has to play another schlub and Sarah Papineau has to play the schlub’s annoyed girlfriend. I think this piece is a well-intentioned morality tale with characters who are a bit too stereotypical to work. The annoyed girlfriend redeems herself in a fashion that seems both naïve and overly sweet, which is not at all like the other 10-minute plays we’ve seen from Calandrino. I’m uncomfortable with the politics around asking someone who’s not from the disabled community to play a man with a severe disability, but Dale Light performs that character – unfortunately the vehicle for the girlfriend’s redemption – well.

Have you noticed a theme aside from writing on the wall? Many writers are directors or actors in the production. “Fish Climbs Tree”’ by Light features Tom Wilson again acting beautifully (that terrified whine!), but one of the two main premises, involving a gun and a computer, doesn’t make a lot of sense. The last play, “Inner Tube” by Fjelstad, had me laughing despite some awkward acting over the New Age/Western-style “Buddhism” bullshit its characters spout while one rips the other’s heart to shreds – such a perfect play for Eugene.

The turnEnsemble with Brandon Rumsey, James Bean, Sarah Pyle and Noah Jenkins, all students at the UO, provides music between and occasionally during the plays. It’s unobtrusive and provides small little hints about what’s to come in several of the plays.

The NW10 is always a mixed bag – but one that gets the brain spinning. You’ve got one more weekend, this one, to see the plays on Friday or Saturday nights or at the Sunday matinee (there’s a talkback after that one) – the tickets are $15, $12 for people 25 and younger, and you can get them by calling 541-465-1506 or clicking here.

What Should I Do This Weekend in Eugene? Top Picks!

Michael P. Watkins as Lawrence Jameson and Tom Wilson as Freddy Benson, the two con men. Photo by Rich Scheeland

What should you, arts loving person, do this weekend? My recs, in a vague order:

1. Nixon in China at the Eugene Opera. Two performances: tonight at 7:30 p.m. and Sunday at 2:30 p.m. at the Hult Center. Tix here or at the box office (some are quite reasonably priced – and hint, if you scan the QR code on the opera’s poster and use the coupon code to get tickets, they’re even cheaper. Yes, I did that). I wrote about original opera idea guy Peter Sellars and soprano Laura Decher Wayte earlier in the week, and here’s Bob Keefer’s story from the Register-Guard.

2. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels at the Very Little Theatre. Tix at 541-344-7751 or at the door, if there are any left – this one is totally selling out, people. Get your tix for next weekend maybe?

3.  The Crucible at the University Theatre – tix here or at the door (free if you’re a student with a student ID starting at 7 p.m. tonight and tomorrow night). Last two shows!

4. Fahrenheit 451 at the Lord Leebrick – tix here or at 541-465-1506, if there are any left.

5. Pina in 3D at Valley River Center 15 – yes, it’s coming to the Bijou, and I swear this will be the only time I pick a disgusting mall over the sweet little Bije, which I freaking adore …  but it’s not in 3D at the Bijou (fingers crossed that this will happen someday). Both director Wim Wenders (swoon for Wenders!) and critics near and far have said the 3D is FANTASTIC for dance movies. (I am also not a big fan of 3D – I think it’s a gimmick, for the most part – but in this case, DANCE. 3D. Yes.)

Peter Sellars Talks ‘Nixon in China’ in Eugene

The Eugene Opera and the University of Oregon have spent quite a lot of time collaborating on events surrounding the Opera’s presentation of Nixon in China – this weekend, Friday night and Sunday matinee, at the Hult Center, tix here – and I was lucky enough to go hear original Nixon conceiver and famous opera/theatre director Peter Sellars when he came on March 8 to talk with the executive director of the UO’s Confucius Institute at the School of Music and Dance’s gorgeous Beall Hall. Thursday was possibly the most gorgeous day Eugene will see until July, so many people with Sellars plans hung out outside, waiting for the doors to Beall to open.

Peter Sellars and Bryna Goodman at Beall Hall, 03/08/12

 

 

After we got in to Beall and the program started, I recorded for a while. I was far away – you’ll have to turn this way up to hear him, but I think it’s pretty much worth it.

A few highlights from the recording:

  • Opera is a participatory art form “that everyone helps to shape”
  • Sellars had been working on Giulio Cesare in Egitto when he titled this opera. “Handel’s opera is Julius Caesar in Egypt, so, duh, Nixon in China, right?”
  • “I had to do a bunch of research, and so there I had the Kissinger memoirs, you know, a difficult book, just a monstrous, thick, oleaginous mass of self-aggrandizement. I was reading these things, and couldn’t believe I had the strength to turn each new page, and I said, ‘Something has to come out of this.’”
  • “Of course, my generation critiqued a lot of that [older Western] culture, so we wanted to make Nixon in China something intelligent, unlike French opera.”
  • “The opera isn’t about China, but about the fact that China … is part of American life, part of American history, and that our futures are linked.”
  •  ”What I love about the opera is that you know where you are at the beginning, and you don’t know where you are at the end. And to me, that’s what a great work of art should do.”
  • This isn’t music that just goes into your mind; it goes into your body. It has a pulse. The rhythm is irresistible, and the tune is catchy, and all of that is happening at the same time that John [Adams] is painting really delicate, subtle psychological pictures of weather conditions, detente, and very fragile feelings of a sunset on a winter day that you would get in a Chinese poem from the Sung Dynasty.”
  • Opera is an art form feast. It’s rich in layers; it’s rich in textures; it’s rich in meaning, and history is this rich, rich, layered, richly textured experience that’s ongoing. … The opera is way richer now than when we wrote it, and it has way more meaning now than it did then.”
  • “California in 1859 was black cowboys, slaves who came west on horses, and Chinese people. That’s the birth of California.” (Er, and the Californios who were already there … but that’s a different story.)
  • “For me, the future of culture in America is going to be Chinese opera.”

After a while, I couldn’t kill my phone battery that way anymore, so I turned off the recording and started live-tweeting instead, as follows (with one other person’s tweets as well):

By that, I’m pretty sure he meant, “Many people wondered what in the world the EUGENE OPERA was doing, taking on such a complicated project, but now that it’s happening, the Opera’s going to keep on pushing itself even more.” Which is true – see the Q&A with Laura Decher Wayte for more on that.

This one I had to shorten obnoxiously in order to fit in the hashtag, dang the luck:

I believe Sellars talked for about five minutes after I left (I thought it was over, but the woman holding the microphone asked one last question). Yay, UO and Eugene Opera and Peter Sellars! That was fascinating.

What’s on in Eugene? REVIEW: Dirty Rotten Scoundrels at the Very Little Theatre

Michael P. Watkins as Lawrence Jameson, Tara Wibrew as Christine Colgate, Tom Wilson as Freddy Benson and Shannon Coltrane as Jolene. Photo by Rich Scheeland

When I walked in Saturday night for the Very Little Theatre’s current show, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, I knew three things:

• Chris Pinto directed Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and Pinto’s both good at and enjoys (based solely on the evidence of years of watching plays, not on any question I’ve put to him) directing farces.

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels was a 1988 movie, which I haven’t yet seen.

• Eugene actor and cartoonist Dan Pegoda told me on Friday when we randomly ran into each other that he saw Scoundrels Thursday night, and that Tom Wilson was absolutely great. Pegoda’s one of the best actors in Eugene, so his recommendation spurred me to get tickets.

During the show, I laughed so hard I about fell into the aisle – and if I hadn’t taken allergy medication, I’m sure I would have had an asthma attack from all of the laughter. Pegoda was accurate in his praise of Wilson, whose inspired, high-energy, alarmingly enjoyable performance as the reprehensible Freddy should win some kind of Eugene physical comedy prize – that “All About Ruprecht” number … my goodness (just about as sexually explicit as the puppets during Avenue Q, but with fewer willing partners).

One of those less than thrilled partners during “Ruprecht” is Jolene Oakes, played with a monstrous wig and a game spirit by Shannon Coltrane. In her big number, “Oklahoma?”, Coltrane (Kate Monster in Lord Leebrick’s Avenue Q last fall) belts out a rip-roaring pile-up of clichés about that particular state with boot-stomping panache. One line is so outrageously funny that it was hard to hear the rest of the song because I was laughing so hard.

I was only pleased when lights came up for intermission because I needed to rehydrate after all of the giggling, chortling and outright belly laughing.

Usually, the reviewers in town don’t talk too much to one another during plays – at least, not about play we’re seeing. After all, we don’t want the directors or actors overhearing us, and we don’t want to influence each other’s reviews. But we have all recently been to opening weekend at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival (my reviews for MyEugene are here, and for Oregon ArtsWatch here), and when we’re down in Ashland, we do tend to get more friendly than we usually are in town. So I chatted with the daily paper’s reviewer at intermission, and we ended up talking about Jeffrey Lane’s book for this play – and its, um, language.

She said that she would probably need to include a bit of a warning about said language in her review (not up yet – I’ll link when it is). I suppose that people often bring their kids or grandkids to the VLT – certainly, there were a couple of 7 or 8-year-olds there the night I went, so parents might want to know about the language, not to mention Wilson’s gasp-inducing sexual advances toward other characters. Me, well, I found the language refreshing. The plot concerns graft, sex, crime and quite a lot of situational comedy. Throw in a well-placed f-word or s-word, and you’ve got a much more real script. And judging from the barks of laughter around me, the language worked well for many people in the audience. (Sadly, a non-scatalogical joke about Omaha fell flat, so to speak – perhaps because only Midwesterners would get it? I did chuckle, but then, I’m from Kansas City.)

Michael P. Watkins as Lawrence Jameson and Tom Wilson as Freddy Benson, the two con men. Photo by Rich Scheeland

Laughing too hard to hear the next few lines (whether of song or book) also happened fairly often with Michael P. Watkins. Watkins, actor/singer/director/etc. who has nailed roles both tragic (Norman in The Dresser) and comic (Dr. Frank-N-Furter in The Rocky Horror Show), plays master con man Lawrence in a charming, ironic, amusing, somewhat vulnerable turn that only gets better after intermission (please, yes, “Ruffhousin Mit Shüffhausen” – dear god, yes). His sidekick Andre, played by Cottage Theatre veteran George Comstock, has a(n a)rousing number, “Like Zis/Like Zat” with the marvelous Jennifer Sellers as Muriel.

Another post-intermission strength is Tara Wibrew as Christine Colgate. To avoid plot spoilers for those who haven’t seen the movie (or who couldn’t predict from the script), I won’t say much more about Christine. Wibrew’s strong stage presence doesn’t quite upstage the guys but does give her a chance to show off her splendid singing chops. And props to VLT for having a six-musician orchestra onstage to time the songs correctly with the action.

Costumer Nancy Boyett must have had some fun with costumes for both the women and the men, and Michael Walker’s set design contains some lovely surprises (and it was fun to see Walker, who also assistant-directed along with Sharon Wetterling, in a couple of small, amusing roles onstage). Despite some occasionally stiff action and a few dropped lines (not from the three main characters, luckily), Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is the play to see in Eugene for sheer enjoyment.

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels runs through March 31, and tickets are available at 541-344-7751 (sadly, not online) or at the box office at 2350 Hilyard Street (kitty-corner to Sundance, the Beanery, Humble Bagel/Beagle, etc.) 2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Wednesday through Saturday and one hour before each performance. Perhaps don’t take the young ones, or anyone who doesn’t like language, but see it if you can.

What’s on in Eugene? REVIEW: The Crucible at University Theatre

Kylie Dehaven as Abigail Williams, Andrew Poletto as Reverend Parris. Photo by Ariel Ogden

In what I feel sure is a self-reinforcing loop, I couldn’t help but think of Dar Williams’ song “Holly Tree” as I watched Arthur Miller’s The Crucible in the Hope Theatre at the University of Oregon.

The singer-songwriter’s lyrics speak of arable land in New England before the Revolution, and just exactly how men of power and rank got their hands on it when women and children, among others, were vulnerable. Miller’s 1953 play, which many people will remember reading in American Lit in high school, reveals this power grab as well.

The Crucible concerns both colonial history and what Miller was experiencing as he wrote it – the Joseph McCarthy era. The play still holds a fair amount of power because of its injustices and complexities; it doesn’t need any justification about “the terrorist era” to make it relevant now and anytime, for at the heart of it lies both a question of personal morality and a question of institutional rot. Those will never be irrelevant.

Just in case you don’t remember the particulars, or in case you didn’t have it assigned in high school: A young woman, Abigail Williams (Kylie DeHaven) covers up her and her friends’ nighttime activities in the forest with accusations of witchcraft. Abby and the other young women of the town were dancing, drinking love potions and listening to Abby’s uncle’s servant Tituba (Naomi Wright) sing songs from Barbados – and they’re discovered by that uncle, Salem’s Reverend Parris (Andrew Poletto).

Kylie Dehaven as Abigail Williams, Riley Shanahan as John Proctor. Photo by Ariel Ogden

This is a problem for the young women. They’ll be publicly whipped for their sins, and they’ll be whispered about all over town and farther. Most of them are servants who need employment or young women of good families who want husbands. The girls find themselves in a bind; this Puritan society has no give to it, no way for them to enjoy themselves without being considered sinful. Meanwhile, they can see that Reverend Parris’ parishoner Thomas Putnam (Karl Metz) wants land and wants to blame certain people in the town for his wife’s miscarriages. They’re clever girls, and they’re stuck in a terrible society for young women – and to get out of their trouble, they play the men against each other and end up killing many of their neighbors. Miller never meant The Crucibleas a play striking a blow for women’s rights – the main antagonist is a young women who wants to get her married lover back and manipulates an entire town, killing people, in order to try for that – but nonetheless, it’s easy for a modern audience to see how girls with no apparent power found horribly damaging ways to take any power they could.

And in the play, the Salem and Boston men enable them time after time by being more willing to believe the girls’ ravings of spirits and their self-inflicted bruises and wounds than being able to consider the political undercurrents of accusations.

Director Theresa May, a professor in the UO’s Department of Theatre, has a cast comprised of mostly inexperienced actors, but they perform admirably. As John Proctor, one of the main focuses of the play – Proctor would not accuse other witches, just as Miller and some others would not give names of fellow former Communists to the McCarthy hearings – Riley Shanahan bears a heavy acting burden that he carries well. Proctor had (consensual) sex with Abigail Williams when she was his servant, and ever since, he’s been trying to reconcile with his wife Elizabeth (Antonia Gomez) and work his farm outside of town. He doesn’t like Reverend Parris’ preaching, so he skips church sometimes, and he’d like to hire a different pastor. And he’s still attracted to Abby. All of that comes even before Elizabeth is accused of witchcraft and before he himself ends up with a death sentence for witchcraft – commutable if he’ll only name others as witches.

Andrew Poletto as Reverend Parris, Riley Shanahan as John Proctor, Antonia Gomez as Elizabeth Proctor. Photo by Ariel Ogden

Part of the strength of the second act comes from the crossing trajectories of two other men: Reverend John Hale (Michael Sugar), who starts out with the intense desire to ferret out witchcraft and who realizes where his well-intentioned but terrible errors have led; and Deputy Governor Danforth (Michelle Yeadon), who takes his authority all too seriously and practically foams at the mouth to enforce what he considers the laws of church and state. (And thank you, Thomas Jefferson, for dividing state from church after the American Revolution!) Sugar, strong in this role, and Yeadon, superb in her depiction of a self-righteous blowhard, show the tensions within and between those who question and those who can’t afford to question, lest the entire social framework come crashing down.

A Fisher King sense pervades the final scenes – the town is wracked by wandering cows; orphans roam from house to house, looking for food, work and affection; crops rot in the fields. That’s all because authority has sickened and been corrupted, not by some evil spirits but by lust for property, power, and righteousness. The land won’t right itself until authority does – and judging from Danforth’s actions, that’s going to take some time.

This play runs about two hours and 45 minutes with an intermission. The Hope Theatre, thanks to its size and lighting grid, is always hot (wear layers that you can take off, and you’ll be happier). But this production of The Crucible keeps the audience in a firm, worried grip as it barrels toward the anguished cry of conclusion.

The Crucible only runs through St. Patrick’s Day, March 17. Tickets are $12 for seniors and students, $14 for the general public, and free to UO students with ID who arrive at the box office between 7 and 7:30 p.m. on the day of the performance (or 1 and and 1:30 p.m. on March 11, the one matinee performance). Tix here or at the door. Getting to the University Theatre is quite easy– there’s free parking just across 11th Ave.; the EmX stops right at Dad’s Gates; or you can park a bike at numerous spots near the building.

If you haven’t read it since high school, or if your high school was too concerned about your possible rebellious tendencies to let you read it, now’s the time to see this deservedly classic play.

What’s on in Eugene? REVIEW: Avenue Q at Actors Cabaret

The Bad Idea Bears and Princeton

For most people (older than, say, 13 – though there’s plenty of swearing and graphic puppet sex, so your mileage may vary on how old your kid needs to be to see this show), Avenue Q means an evening of semi-shocked and delighted laughter. If you missed the production at the Lord Leebrick Theatre Company earlier this season but you like the songs and/or the characters and/or you’re interested in seeing how the Muppets on Sesame Street might have grown up, you need to get tickets to the Actors Cabaret of Eugene performance.

Despite the normal pain of dealing with recorded music instead of live musicians (that’s a cramped area – no way to fit in the live players), the ACE crew deftly handles the complexities of this puppet-heavy production and makes sweet, funny work of it. ACE is a dinner theater; if you eat, tickets are $41.95 or $35.95 at matinees – but you can also just buy drinks and dessert (which comes out at intermission) or only a ticket, and that’s $16-$27, depending on where you sit. More info and online buying here.

On Saturday of opening weekend, much of the audience clearly hadn’t heard the songs before, and many people emitted barks or snorts of surprised laughter at the sexually frank lines and songs like “The Internet Is for Porn.” The energy of the musical, with songs piling rapidly on top of one another and an enjoyably inventive puppet sex scene (I think Kate Monster has been watching the “Bend Over Boyfriend” DVDs quite a lot), doesn’t let up from the opening scene through the intermission. Post-intermission serves as a time for re-evaluation and rebuilding and rediscovery, and it’s a bit calmer, wiser, older – and it features the wonderfully apt “I Wish I Could Go Back to College,” which had every adult in the audience nodding wryly along.

Nicky and Rod, the bickering roommates; photo by Jim Roberts

Avenue Q won the Tony for Best Musical in 2004, but that doesn’t make it perfect. Its issues transfer to ACE as they did to the Leebrick earlier this season, though some things are different because of casting. When I first heard that ACE had cast a white actor in the role of Avenue Q’s Christmas Eve, I thought that was both weird and disturbing.

I don’t like it when people of other ethnicities get cast instead of Asian-American actors in roles specifically written for Asian Americans (see: Jonathan Pryce cast in Miss Saigon – a formative moment for Asian-American actors and the theatre community as a whole).

And yet Christmas Eve … well, let’s say the role itself has some problems. She comes onstage during the cast-introducing “It Sucks to Be Me” and instantly plays on stereotypes of Japanese accents during her part of the song. (Some people have wondered how a woman with two master’s degrees, as we hear her state several times, could sound as if she’d just started to speak English.) A portion of the show’s comedy focuses on Christmas Eve’s friends laughing at the way she pronounces the letter l, and more than a little of the laughter during the ballad “The More You Love Someone” comes from the audience laughing at the way she pronounces the word love. So perhaps the fact that ACE cast Melissa Miller in the role was intended to point up the bizarreness of this hipster-racist character? I don’t know, but Miller has a lovely voice and did a fine job playing the character.

When Avenue Q debuted back in 2003, I didn’t anticipate that parts of it would soon feel dated. All right, by “soon” I mean nine years later – almost a decade of Avenue Q?! – but seriously, even in the early 2000s, a song called “Mix Tape” wasn’t exactly right. I’ve always felt that the musical was written by, and for, people about my age (book writer Jeff Whitty, originally from Coos Bay, is about a year older than I). Would Rod still be in the closet if the musical were set in 2012? Doubtful.

But let’s look at late Gen Xers. We’re people who were indeed still making mix tapes in our late teens and early twenties, people who watched a lot of Sesame Street and The Muppet Show in our youth, people who left college during a recession (no, the mid-1990s weren’t a job picnic, Millennials – you’re not the only ones having a hard time post-college, as the character of Princeton makes it all too clear), people who started using the Internet when it was overrun by porn. Seriously, if you remember the search engine AltaVista (or Ask Jeeves, or any number of pre-Google searches), Avenue Q is like watching the history of our 20s spool out onstage. Generation X discovers alcohol, sex, disappointment; Gen X can’t get a job and falls into debt; Gen X can’t figure out its purpose, whatever that might be; Gen X can’t quite admit it’s gay and makes up a fake girlfriend (yes, I once invented a fake boyfriend, though not as fake as Rod’s “Girlfriend, Who Lives in Canada”).

That said, the actors playing the characters aren’t part of Gen X (we’re too old to play recent college kids – yep, it’s true). This cast does a fine job with it though. Props to Samantha White, who plays Kate Monster with a combination of bravado and vulnerability; Mark Van Beever, who plays Rod with a blunt sweetness; and Cody Mendonca, who makes a good privileged/frustrated Princeton, Cameron Walker as the icky Trekkie Monster and the rest of the cast.

Don’t take the kids, and do plan to be confronted with some potentially problematic songs (“Everyone’s A Little Bit Racist” might be my least favorite musical number since “A Puzzlement” in The King and I), but for a funny, fast-paced, sexy romp, Avenue Q’s a good bet this weekend (or any weekend through April 7).